Preparing for AI in Document-centric Processes
You would have to be hiding in a deep, dark place to have missed the rife speculation about the impact of AI.
...Artificial intelligence creates more buzz and more speculation than plain old automation. Vendors claim AI bragging rights to feed social media interest, and more organisations feel the need to ask about AI in RFPs (‘requests for proposal’ – tenders).
Definition matters in this space, so let’s declare our boundary lines. Automation is rules-based. Whether it’s a robot building cars or Legito building documents, the work product is pre-defined. Save for interruptions, the output is assured, predictable and consistent. In manufacturing terminology, automation creates a work product built to required tolerances and meeting a specification.
Using ‘AI’ as an acronym makes it too easy to forget that it’s artificial intelligence. Intelligence intuits a result from a set of data, usually unstructured data – structured data is more apt to be processed by rules. The deductions from intelligence are inherently unpredictable, and the work product’s quality is hard to measure (at least at the point of production). In contrast to rule-based methods, it’s not possible to state clearly the route by which the intelligence led to the output. If a machine manages to pass the Turing Test, it will be due to AI, not automation. Advanced AI is undoubtedly clever stuff, and good applications of AI will benefit humankind.
The product has features with elements of AI. Insert a question into a template and then select some text, and you’ll see Legito make intelligent suggestions about using the question to drive conditional text. Using a template, the menu bars configure to offer commands predicted to match your next action. Include a date in a template and see how the document manager extracts the date so you can drive date-driven workflows. Useful, time-saving and nice to use, but the documents are not generated by AI. That’s a good thing. Legito customers want control, compliance, consistency, all the benefits of rules-based automation.
Talking about documents, it’s interesting to see how AI is being used to handle documents. Developers are building AI systems to ‘read’ large volumes of documents that are too tedious and too expensive to trust to human review. Lawyers sift documents for evidence in litigation. HR departments sift resumes from job applicants.
Software companies sift code looking for instances of open source software. Insurance companies sift claims documents for evidence of fraud. They have to use AI because most documents are the epitome of unstructured data and, worse, they are stored in ways that make it hard to retrieve relevant documents (for example, alphabetically or by date). Much of this effort (and the inherent variable quality of the results) could be avoided or reduced if documents were built methodically to retain the data used to create them, and if they were stored in a way that captures that data. That’s what Legito can do.
Artificial intelligence creates more buzz and more speculation than plain old automation. Vendors claim AI bragging rights to feed social media interest, and more organisations feel the need to ask about AI in RFPs (‘requests for proposal’ – tenders).
Definition matters in this space, so let’s declare our boundary lines. Automation is rules-based. Whether it’s a robot building cars or Legito building documents, the work product is pre-defined. Save for interruptions, the output is assured, predictable and consistent. In manufacturing terminology, automation creates a work product built to required tolerances and meeting a specification.
Using ‘AI’ as an acronym makes it too easy to forget that it’s artificial intelligence. Intelligence intuits a result from a set of data, usually unstructured data – structured data is more apt to be processed by rules. The deductions from intelligence are inherently unpredictable, and the work product’s quality is hard to measure (at least at the point of production). In contrast to rule-based methods, it’s not possible to state clearly the route by which the intelligence led to the output. If a machine manages to pass the Turing Test, it will be due to AI, not automation. Advanced AI is undoubtedly clever stuff, and good applications of AI will benefit humankind.
The product has features with elements of AI. Insert a question into a template and then select some text, and you’ll see Legito make intelligent suggestions about using the question to drive conditional text. Using a template, the menu bars configure to offer commands predicted to match your next action. Include a date in a template and see how the document manager extracts the date so you can drive date-driven workflows. Useful, time-saving and nice to use, but the documents are not generated by AI. That’s a good thing. Legito customers want control, compliance, consistency, all the benefits of rules-based automation.
Talking about documents, it’s interesting to see how AI is being used to handle documents. Developers are building AI systems to ‘read’ large volumes of documents that are too tedious and too expensive to trust to human review. Lawyers sift documents for evidence in litigation. HR departments sift resumes from job applicants.
Software companies sift code looking for instances of open source software. Insurance companies sift claims documents for evidence of fraud. They have to use AI because most documents are the epitome of unstructured data and, worse, they are stored in ways that make it hard to retrieve relevant documents (for example, alphabetically or by date). Much of this effort (and the inherent variable quality of the results) could be avoided or reduced if documents were built methodically to retain the data used to create them, and if they were stored in a way that captures that data. That’s what Legito can do.
More Weekly Articles
After 15 successful years as a Knowledge Manager with NCTM law firm (Milan), now advises UniqLegal S.p.A. in the creation of a combined proprietary internal knowledge management system.
After 15 successful years as a Knowledge Manager with NCTM law firm (Milan), now advises UniqLegal S.p.A. in the creation of a combined proprietary internal knowledge management system.
Luigi Cominelli is not only an Associate Professor of Sociology and Negotiation at the University of
Milan Law School, but also the Knowledge Manager at UniQLegal. Besides his professional interests,
Luigi has a passion for Negotiation, Dispute Resolution and cognitive science. Whether through
teaching, writing, or working inhouse, Luigi has made a career out of assisting parties across various
industries to reach fair and amical resolutions. His writings have focused on public and corporate
ombudsmen, civil justice, family mediation, criminal mediation, peer mediation, alternative dispute
resolution, online negotiation dispute resolution and public bureaucracies.
“Getting a student interested or eager to defy conventional wisdom is certainly one of the biggest joys I get from teaching.”
I always had a strong impulse to understand how things work, so I guess in the beginning, I was primarily interested in research. But good research needs to be understandable, and if it cannot be explained, it is useless. Besides, I come from a family of teachers, so the pedagogical aspect of the learning process, and not just the notions themselves, has been a big part of what motivates me. Getting a student interested or eager to defy conventional wisdom is certainly one of the biggest joys I get from teaching.
My approach is hands-on, so I hope that when they finish the course, students see the world from another perspective, and learn to do new things. I know that for young lawyers, prevailing and being right is of the utmost importance, but my first objective is teaching them the importance of understanding, cooperating, and being creative in finding solutions.
What interests you most about LegalTech.
I’ve always been super-interested in technology. Although I enjoyed my law school years and practice, sometimes I regret not having taken a technological degree. But then I found that a lot of lawyers had the same dream… Technology (and LegalTech is no different) makes things easier, more understandable and enjoyable, and frees your time for real intellectual work (or leisure). In dispute resolution, technology may be employed foremost as a way to reduce distances, and allow for better communication.
It certainly does. One of the biggest challenges of Legal Tech, paradoxically, is to make lawyers understand that technology is their friend, not their enemy. Lawyers normally have a humanities background, so you have to develop a maieutic attitude and bring out the techie in them.
UniQLegal is a new experience in the Italian market for legal services, bringing together two law firms and a big banking group. It’s a start-up with a solid basis, and it will be centered around smartening the traditional work of lawyers, also through LegalTech. Sophisticated corporate clients nowadays need to see that their counsels understand, and in some ways also share, their focus on productivity and efficiency.
We have been seeing a gradual and evolutionary progress of the use of technology in the legal world throughout the last decades. Traumatic and global events such as
Covid-19 will push a lot of professionals out of their comfort zone. LegalTech will have to be ready to provide them the solutions that mimic real life interaction, and make itself “invisible” to be more effective.
I always had a strong impulse to understand how things work, so I guess in the beginning, I was primarily interested in research. But good research needs to be understandable, and if it cannot be explained, it is useless. Besides, I come from a family of teachers, so the pedagogical aspect of the learning process, and not just the notions themselves, has been a big part of what motivates me. Getting a student interested or eager to defy conventional wisdom is certainly one of the biggest joys I get from teaching.
My approach is hands-on, so I hope that when they finish the course, students see the world from another perspective, and learn to do new things. I know that for young lawyers, prevailing and being right is of the utmost importance, but my first objective is teaching them the importance of understanding, cooperating, and being creative in finding solutions.
What interests you most about LegalTech.
I’ve always been super-interested in technology. Although I enjoyed my law school years and practice, sometimes I regret not having taken a technological degree. But then I found that a lot of lawyers had the same dream… Technology (and LegalTech is no different) makes things easier, more understandable and enjoyable, and frees your time for real intellectual work (or leisure). In dispute resolution, technology may be employed foremost as a way to reduce distances, and allow for better communication.
It certainly does. One of the biggest challenges of Legal Tech, paradoxically, is to make lawyers understand that technology is their friend, not their enemy. Lawyers normally have a humanities background, so you have to develop a maieutic attitude and bring out the techie in them.
UniQLegal is a new experience in the Italian market for legal services, bringing together two law firms and a big banking group. It’s a start-up with a solid basis, and it will be centered around smartening the traditional work of lawyers, also through LegalTech. Sophisticated corporate clients nowadays need to see that their counsels understand, and in some ways also share, their focus on productivity and efficiency.
We have been seeing a gradual and evolutionary progress of the use of technology in the legal world throughout the last decades. Traumatic and global events such as
Covid-19 will push a lot of professionals out of their comfort zone. LegalTech will have to be ready to provide them the solutions that mimic real life interaction, and make itself “invisible” to be more effective.
After 15 successful years as a Knowledge Manager with NCTM law firm (Milan), now advises UniqLegal S.p.A. in the creation of a combined proprietary internal knowledge management system.
More Industry Insights
We know Technology and Operations departments are constantly challenged and are often only one task away from being overwhelmed. Hard-coded solutions require a lot of time and effort to create and maintain. An easy to maintain automation tool can reduce the normally high probability of (human) error, and make it easier for your internal clients be self sufficient and for you and your internal clients to reach mutual understanding and create sustainable solutions that increase all round efficiency.
We have helped many Technology and Operations teams and we can help you. We share our know-how and tips from automation experts and satisfied clients who have already implemented a document automation solution to help you on your way to do it correctly, starting from determining your use cases, selecting the correct tool, implementation, and building 100% adoption.
%
%
Step 1: Identify Your Use Cases
Internal Research
First, identify individuals in departments or teams who will benefit from the change and increased efficiency (typically managers). Assure interviewees that may be resistant to change that there is nothing to fear from automation, and that their input is valued and will help the company by helping them to be even more successful at their jobs.
Determine the key stakeholders. Here is a list of departments which, in our experience, we have found benefit greatly from automation:
After you have determined the correct people to speak to, start your research. Try to avoid questions that elicit feelings or opinions. Here are some standard questions that could prove useful:
Calculate Your Automation’s Return On Investment (ROI)
Use our Document Automation Matrix to estimate how long it will take you to automate a document, and our ROI Calculator will help you see how well (and how soon!) Legito will work for you.
Investment = Time and Resources spent in the following areas:
Return = Benefits reaped from invested time and resources
Best way to calculate these results is to research how much time it currently takes to draft different documents from various categories and multiply that number by the number of times it is drafted per year. Next, assume that 90% of that time could be saved through proper automation.
Similar to calculating increased document drafting speed, determine the state of your current document lifecycle management processes, and also how much time is spent. Trial an automated document lifecycle management solution and capture how the time it takes to complete the same processes after automation. The difference is your time saved per process, which can then be expanded to include additional processes by multiplying that time by the frequency these lifecycle processes are activated.
Like the above scenarios, it is possible to test the before and after state of your signing processes to determine time saved. Broadly, research has shown that a well deployed eSignature solution can decrease signing times by 95 percent.
Averaging these three criteria can help you confidently create an estimate of your automation ROI. Legito’s custom ROI Calculator and Automation Matrix may give you a good starting place to reasonably estimate your expected ROI.
Frequently Automated Documents For Technology and Operations Departments
Technology and Operations teams’ document needs are almost entirely dependent on the nature of the industry or the department. Explore these factors and more in our Industry and Department focused Academy articles.
Step 2: Choose the Right Solution
Important Features
Legito customers similarly placed in your field have found that, in addition to Legito’s core features, the following features cater particularly well to Technology and Operations teams:
Legito strongly recommends initially testing a complex automation solution (e.g., multiple logical dependencies in an automated template) on a small use case.
This may provide an opportunity to investigate many different features. Not only can you determine if the product has everything that you need, but it’s a perfect opportunity to try a pilot project that can serve as a warm-up for an actual implementation. and roll out. Using a complex use case has the advantage of it being more likely that any product limitations will be discovered early. So rather than encountering difficulties later on in the implementation stage and having to start over, these important decisions may be made early.
Fortunately, Legito offers a 30-day free trial that gives you the opportunity to do just this.
Useful Resources
Commonly used criteria
Additional criteria will depend on the size of your business (Enterprise, Midsize, or Early Stage), and of course, company specific criteria will be determined based on your business’ unique use cases.
Step 3: Implementation
Once you have selected a tool, get to know it and have at least one person learn all the ins and outs. This person may become your first Power User.
Determine which would be more appropriate, an in-house or an outsourced implementation solution.
Have the individual most intimate with the workings of the new solution work with your Knowledge Experts and manage expectations of the solution’s capabilities (probably this initial Power User).
Select a narrow use case that, based on your research, will show users just how much it can help, and will present quick measurable results that can be communicated companywide. Let this first attempt provide tips and guidance on future implementations.
On average, it takes three iterations of reworking a newly implemented solution until it functions properly. Communicate with your implementation team in order to get it right. Once you’ve worked out the kinks, it will be easier to work on the next automation solution.
After you’re satisfied with the initial use case, build upon lessons learned, and select another. Don’t make a half-way effort, make sure you have perfected the automation use case. Then you can move with confidence to a new project with increased scope and complexity.
Timing – select an off-peak period in your business cycle to ensure a smooth roll-out and ensure the least disruption.
In-house Implementation
Outsourced Implementation
Legito has a list of trusted partners.
Step 4: Adoption
End-user On-Boarding
Communication! Ensure that your messaging manages End User expectations for the product’s capabilities and the benefits.
Learn as You Go training. A product with an intuitive user interface, combined with a well-executed implementation will not require training. Ideally a user will be able to slide smoothly into using your solution with little need for external resources. The best way to do this is for users to learn as they use the product. Some ways to do this are:
Feedback & Continuous Improvement
Curveballs – You may get lucky, but it’s highly unlikely that everything will go perfectly in the first instance. Usually there will be something that wasn’t anticipated. Some fringe case that wasn’t anticipated but actually may prove worth including. Be patient, listen to your team, and make the changes as you need.
Being 100% programming free, Legito makes it easy to adjust and update its automations.
Measurements
Take the estimations determined from your original ROI calculations and compare inputs and results from your pre-automation state with metrics captured after the implementation of your chosen solution. Use this real data to calculate your real ROI and see how much you’ve saved through automation.
Legito’s Analytics features may be useful for additional quantitative measures to your assessment.
Start Automating Now